Anyone use a heart rate monitor during training? I've never used one and question the utility. Is the point to tell you that you could be running harder? Should be running slower?
The point of a HRM is telling you what your heart rate is. The rest is a mixture of conjecture, opinion and maybe religion. My two cents (and two thoughts):
First is the issue of safety. There is some idea that a "safe" zone is determined by some formula -- ie, 220 minus your age as the maximum HR, and you're supposed to train at 80% of that or so. However, the heart has a way of letting you know when it's at its max (which might, or might not be at the above formula). In addition, no HRM will keep you from having a sudden coronary event if you've got some plaque ready to break loose, or an aneurysm ready to go, etc.
Second, while a HRM (like other devices) can help you determine a good training pace for you, I know first-hand that I enjoy running (and cycling) a lot more the less electronics that I carry with me. I mean, don't we kill some aspects of running, riding, etc when we're constantly staring at a HRM, GPS, stop watch, etc etc?
I have used a HR monitor for the last year to assist my training. At first, I used it on longer runs to make sure I wasn't overexerting myself too early, and thereby pooping out halfway through the run. Now that I am running 6+ miles easily, I use it to gauge my effort level for that particular run. For instance, when I am running for speed, I should be looking at a rather high HR throughout the run, and when I am running distance (getting used to 1.5 hr+ runs), I just use it as a reference.
Many people do just fine without them; as for me I record my HR stats with all my other run data and track it over time, and it has helped me see improvement in areas I wouldn't normally see.
The previous post references "training zones" that a HR monitor can help you establish and maintain, but it also makes the point that you will know when you've reached a limit. While I don't feel that a HR monitor distracts from my runs, they are a little weird to wear at first. I found it to be an invaluable resource as a new runner, but the more I run the less I need it for pace or distance runs. Good luck.
I had mixed feelings at first as well. I ran for about 7 years with out any fancy devices. However after much debate I decided to splurge on the Forerunner 50 with HRM and footpod. While running, I find that I don't really use the HRM readings as much as the pace readings. But I also don't obsess about those either. I will glance at my watch occasionlly to see that I'm around what I think I should be, and that is about it.
The interesting thing for me is after the run because the info is uploaded to my computer. I can see my varying HR and pace. I don't really know if it is helping me in my training, other than seeing progress as I log more miles but it is neat in any event.
As with the zones and safe HR I think most times your body will tell you what is OK. Mine will get up to 185 while I'm running (and 189 is supposed to be my max), and I don't feel like I'm going to pass out or keel over. But as malyce7 said, it is useful on long runs to make sure you don't over do it too early in the run.
As a funny side note, when I first got it I paid a lot of attention to it since it was new and I was getting use to it. On this particular run I was monitoring my HR so I would take note quite often. Well about 3 miles into the run I see my HR is around 45 bpm. I had a second of panic that my heart was stopping, but quickly realized that I felt fine so it just wasn't reading right. LOL.
I like my heart rate monitor for giving me an indication of where I am with respect to my lactate threshold when doing intervals... although it's far easier (and cheapoer) to monitor your breathing to get that bit of info. When your breathing changes you're at (or extremely close to) your LT. As a numbers nerd, I also like to use my numbers to product where I am with respect to my VO2 mac, and use %VO2 reserve to gauge my training intensity. This is probably a lot more in depth than my (very) amateur status as a runner requires, but it's fun and interesting for me and provides goals to keep me working hard. To me, that's the name of the game with any gadget.
I use a heart rate monitor along with my Garmin 305 to share my training intensity with my cardiologist. When he'd look into my profile on motionbased and see my heart rate above his recommended threshold i could count on a call and a lecture. 2 years of this monitoring and I'm now riding without him worrying whether I'm going to make the next appointment. My recommended max has gone up to roughly the benchmark 220 - age and my heartrates now never come close... Without daily Actos use.
Hey folks... I'm also looking into HRM, not too interested in ones with distance/pace capability so I'm looking at
the timex ironman race trainer:
http://www.bodytronics.com/page/bodytronics/PROD/TIMEX_MONITORS/TIM5K21
and the polar RS200
http://www.bodytronics.com/page/bodytronics/PROD/TIMEX_MONITORS/TIM5K21
It looks like you get more bang for your buck in the actual watch with the ironman, but the polar has the ability to upload your info to polar-specific software correct? Anyone have any experience with this?
Thanks!
I got a cheapo one from Lidls (UK) under £10.00 - works fine & I like the warnings it gives me when I'm going too quick or too slow, though I cannot download results. Working below my max, though interesting to see in (very occasional) competition the rate goes up, so helps with control & keeping the pace higher.